A Recent Ban Across Multiple National Parks Sparks Major Controversy Among Visitors

Published
A Recent Ban Across Multiple National Parks Sparks Major Controversy Among Visitors

“National parks are the best idea we ever had. Absolutely American, absolutely democratic, they reflect us at our best rather than our worst,” said novelist Wallace Stegner, via the National Parks Service website. And we couldn’t agree more. From Yellowstone National Park, established in 1872, to the New River Gorge National Park and Preserve, established in 2021, national parks are a vital and valued part of the United States. And while many of the national parks are protected to help preserve their wildness for future generations, the parks still undergo changes and updates from time to time. One recent update over the last couple of years that has caused a bit of a stir is some of the parks and national historic sites going cashless for entrance and campground fees. 



While the National Park Service (NPS) made the decision to ban cash at some parks to help reduce time spent waiting in entrance lines, it left some parkgoers angry. In fact, in March 2024, a few parkgoers sued the NPS for not accepting cash. A judge dismissed the lawsuit in February of 2025; however, an updated version of the lawsuit was refiled and is still in process at the time of writing.

Concerns about the national parks going cash free

Even with the lawsuit, additional parks like the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks in California have been moving ahead with the transition to cashless entrance fees. The main reasons given include efficiency concerns, ostensibly leaving park employees with more time to do other things. “During peak season, park rangers spend up to eight and a half hours per day documenting, reporting, and transferring cash receipts,” the Sequoia and Kings Canyon parks superintendent Clay Jordan said in a press release about the new policy.

Still, parkgoers seem to be unsure about the change and have taken to social media to voice their opinions, with people on both sides. As one Redditor explained, “I’m really conflicted. The costs (both time and financial) associated with cash make it cost prohibitive, but the federal government absolutely should accept the currency that it produces.” Others on the same post mentioned that cashless policies could be potentially problematic for international visitors, who may plan to travel with cash to avoid international fees on card transactions.

See also  The Seventy2 on Shark Tank: What Really Happened?

Some also questioned whether the change would actually save time. Addressing the efficacy of the cash free system at Mount Rainier National Park, one person on X (formerly known as Twitter) posted: “Is [the] internet reliable enough to do speedy transactions there? I’m sure this is how many already pay but a slow internet day will result in really slow lines.”



Parks that are already cashless and where to use your cash instead

Dave Pennells

By Dave Pennells

Dave Pennells, MS, has contributed his expertise as a career consultant and training specialist across various fields for over 15 years. At City University of Seattle, he offers personal career counseling and conducts workshops focused on practical job search techniques, resume creation, and interview skills. With a Master of Science in Counseling, Pennells specializes in career consulting, conducting career assessments, guiding career transitions, and providing outplacement services. Her professional experience spans multiple sectors, including banking, retail, airlines, non-profit organizations, and the aerospace industry. Additionally, since 2001, he has been actively involved with the Career Development Association of Australia.